View Research PDF

South African Rail Sector Outlook Under Third‑Party Access Reforms

Introduction

South Africa’s freight rail sector is on the cusp of transformative change. In recent years, the government has moved to end Transnet Freight Rail’s historic monopoly by allowing third‐party operators to run trains on the national rail network

MONEYWEB.CO.ZA

. A new National Rail Policy (2022) and Freight Logistics Roadmap (2023) have set the stage for open access, with an independent Transport Economic Regulator and a published Network Statement outlining terms for private rail operators

RAILWAYSAFRICA.COM

ARIA.ORG.ZA

. These reforms aim to unlock investment, improve efficiency, and shift huge volumes of freight from road to rail – targeting up to 250 million tonnes per year onto rail within five years

FOCUSONTRANSPORT.CO.ZA

. Over the next 3 to 10 years, the South African rail industry is expected to undergo structural reforms and infrastructure upgrades that present significant opportunities, while also posing new challenges and risk factors. This report provides a detailed analysis of the sector’s outlook in light of third‐party access, focusing on key opportunities, needed investments, rolling stock demand, and the strategic position of Traxtion, a leading private rail operator. High-quality sources are referenced throughout to support a leveraged finance credit review perspective.

Narrow Gauge vs. Standard Gauge: Relevance to South Africa

A fundamental technical aspect of railways is track gauge – the distance between rails. South Africa predominantly uses the Cape gauge (narrow gauge of 1,067 mm), unlike the international standard gauge (1,435 mm) used in many other countries

EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG

MININGWEEKLY.COM

. The choice of gauge has historical roots: Cape gauge was adopted in the 19th century to reduce construction costs, but it comes with certain limitations

MININGWEEKLY.COM

. Key differences and their relevance are:

Stability and Speed: Standard gauge generally offers greater stability at high speeds and can support heavier axle loads with less wear on tracks, enabling faster and smoother operations. Narrow gauge railways like South Africa’s can handle heavy freight (thanks to robust engineering) but may impose speed limits and tighter curve radii, which can reduce efficiency

REDDIT.COM

Loading Profile: A wider gauge can allow larger rolling stock dimensions (width and maybe height), which is advantageous for double-stack container trains or broader freight cars. South Africa has innovated within its narrow gauge – for instance, running double-stack container trains on certain lines – but this requires careful engineering (e.g. lowered tracks or higher catenary) to fit within bridges and tunnels

RAILFREIGHT.COM

Interoperability: As neighboring countries in the region mostly use the same Cape gauge, South Africa’s rail network is interoperable with them. A shift to standard gauge in South Africa, as occasionally proposed, would be a massive undertaking (estimated cost ~R1.5 trillion) and would break compatibility with regional networks

RAILWAYPRO.COM

. Thus, current policy is to retain Cape gauge for existing lines but consider standard gauge for new high-capacity corridors on a case-by-case basis where justified by cost-benefit analysis

RAILWAYPRO.COM

Future Outlook: The 2022 National Rail Policy White Paper does advocate eventually migrating to standard gauge for new projects to align with global standards and African Union recommendations

RAILWAYPRO.COM

. However, over the next 3–10 years, South Africa’s core network will remain narrow gauge. The immediate focus is on improving service and capacity on the existing gauge through better maintenance and investments, rather than costly gauge conversion. Nonetheless, gauge considerations will influence rolling stock procurement – new locomotives and wagons must be built or adapted to Cape gauge, and any long-term plan for standard gauge would require parallel equipment and dual-gauge strategies.

Locomotive and Wagon Standards & Market Norms

The rolling stock in South Africa – locomotives and wagons – has evolved under Transnet’s legacy practices and will need to adapt to the open-access era. Key market norms and technical standards include: Gauge and Design: All mainline rolling stock is built for 1,067 mm Cape gauge, which dictates certain design parameters (e.g. narrower frame). Despite the smaller gauge, South African freight trains have globally recognized capabilities – heavy axle loads (often 18–26 tons/axle on key corridors) and long train lengths for bulk commodities. Couplers are AAR standard knuckle couplers (compatible with heavy freight practice), and air brakes are standard. The loading gauge (clearance profile) is somewhat smaller than on standard gauge systems, but innovations like low-bed wagons allow double-stacking of containers on Cape gauge lines such as the Durban–Johannesburg corridor

RAILFREIGHT.COM

. As third-party operators enter, they must use compatible equipment; this creates a market for Cape gauge locomotives and wagons, either newly built or refurbished from existing stock. Age and Lifespan: Transnet’s fleet has historically been aged – prior to recent procurement, the average locomotive age was over 30 years (design life ~30 years)

STATECAPTURE.ORG.ZA

. A massive 1,064-locomotive order in the mid-2010s aimed to renew the fleet and cut the average age from 33 to 22 years

BLOOMBERG.COM

. However, due to procurement setbacks and corruption scandals, not all new units were delivered, and many older units remain in service. Freight wagons also often serve decades; many date back to the 1970s–80s, though periodic refurbishment keeps them operable. The market norm for locomotive lifespan is ~30 years before rebuild or replacement, and for wagons about 30–50 years with maintenance. Going forward, third-party operators will likely mix refurbished older locomotives (acquired second-hand from Transnet or abroad) with new builds to meet service needs. This trend is seen already – e.g. Traxtion acquired 1970s-built Class 34 locomotives from Transnet and overhauled them to extend life

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

. Modern, fuel-efficient and reliable locomotives will be in demand to improve service quality. Maintenance Practices: Safety regulations (now overseen by the Rail Safety Regulator) mandate strict maintenance schedules. Typically, locomotives undergo daily inspections, periodic servicing (every few weeks), and heavy overhauls every 6–10 years. For example, Traxtion’s overhaul of Class 39 locomotives included a “through six-yearly inspection followed by a major overhaul” replacing injectors, pumps, turbochargers, brakes, and reprofiling wheels

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

. This illustrates best practice: preventive maintenance to ensure reliability on an aging fleet. Transnet historically performed heavy maintenance at its large depots; now, private companies like Traxtion have established their own rail service hubs (e.g. the Rosslyn facility near Pretoria) to rebuild and maintain locomotives to OEM standards

TRAXTION.AFRICA

. Going forward, we expect multiple certified maintenance providers, adherence to high safety standards, and potentially new technologies (remote diagnostics, condition monitoring) to improve reliability across the network – a crucial factor for lenders concerned about operational uptime. Financing Models: Rolling stock is capital-intensive, and various financing models are used in the market. Transnet traditionally owned its locomotives and wagons, funding purchases via its balance sheet and debt (often backed by the government or financed through export-credit agencies for imported equipment). In the emerging open-access market, leasing and private finance are becoming more common. Companies like Traxtion operate as leasing providers – they own fleets and lease locomotives or complete train services to clients (mines, industries, or other smaller operators)

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

. This model allows users to pay for capacity without huge upfront capital outlays, and it provides steady rental income to the asset owner. We also see private–public investment partnerships: for instance, mining companies are considering co-investing in locomotives and wagons dedicated to export corridors to ensure capacity for their products

RAILWAY-TECHNOLOGY.COM

. Financing might involve long-term contracts that underpin loans, or consortiums where an operator, customers, and financiers share risk. Overall, asset-backed financing (with locomotives as collateral) and long-term lease agreements will likely be key for fleet expansion. Lessors will pay attention to maintenance and re-marketing risk (Cape gauge is a niche market, but expanding regional demand could make used equipment deployable across sub-Saharan Africa).

Structural Reforms and Third‑Party Access

South Africa’s rail reform is structured around separating infrastructure management from operations and introducing regulated open access. In December 2024, the government finalized the Transnet Network Statement in line with the new Economic Regulation of Transport Act (ERT Act)

ARIA.ORG.ZA

. This established the framework for third-party train operating companies (TOCs) to run on Transnet’s ~22,500 km network

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

. Key elements of these structural reforms include:

Independent Infrastructure Manager: Transnet has set up a dedicated division, the Transnet Rail Infrastructure Manager (TRIM), which is to operate at arm’s length from Transnet’s own freight operations

RAILWAYSAFRICA.COM

. This vertical separation is meant to ensure fair treatment of all operators on the network, avoiding conflicts of interest. The infrastructure manager will handle train path allocation, network maintenance, and infrastructure investment, while competing freight operators (including Transnet Freight Rail and newcomers like Traxtion or others) run trains

ARIA.ORG.ZA

Network Statement & Tariffs: The Network Statement (published 20 Dec 2024) details the terms and conditions for access – how to apply for train slots, technical requirements, and the tariff methodology for track access fees

FOCUSONTRANSPORT.CO.ZA

. A differentiated tariff system has been introduced to ensure transparent, non-discriminatory pricing for different types of traffic and routes

FOCUSONTRANSPORT.CO.ZA

. The Transport Economic Regulator will oversee these access charges to prevent monopoly pricing and ensure viability for private operators

ARIA.ORG.ZA

Open Access Implementation Timeline: The reforms are already in motion. Private parties could begin applying for their preferred train slots from April 2025

BLOOMBERG.COM

. The government expects to announce the first successful bidders for route capacity by Q3 2025, with private operators running on the mainlines as early as October 2025

THEAFRICAREPORT.COM

. Initially, a limited number of slots on key corridors will be allocated as a pilot. For example, Transnet previously invited expressions of interest for slots on two major corridors (likely the container corridor between Gauteng and Durban, and the Cape Corridor) as a test for wider reform

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

. Over the next 3 years, we anticipate a gradual ramp-up: a handful of third-party freight trains in 2025–2026, focusing on export commodity routes and intermodal services, then expanding to more routes and frequencies as capacity allows.

Policy Support and Oversight: Top government officials, including President Cyril Ramaphosa, have championed open access as part of South Africa’s Economic Reconstruction and Recovery Plan

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

. The creation of a Transport Economic Regulator (TER) and an interim Rail Economic Regulator ensures that an independent body monitors the process, adjudicates disputes, and enforces fair access

RAILWAYSAFRICA.COM

. This is crucial given that prior to now, Transnet essentially regulated itself with no external oversight

ARIA.ORG.ZA

. The commitment at Cabinet level (via the National Rail Policy White Paper) is to reposition rail as the backbone of transport for both passengers and freight

RAILWAYSAFRICA.COM

, learning from global best practices to avoid pitfalls like excessive fragmentation or underinvestment

RAILWAYSAFRICA.COM

Public-Private Partnerships: Recognizing Transnet’s financial and operational struggles in recent years, the government is actively courting private investment to upgrade rail infrastructure. A Private Sector Participation (PSP) unit has been established under the DBSA (Development Bank of Southern Africa) to facilitate co-investment in rail and ports

RAILWAYSAFRICA.COM

. In 2023, the Cabinet’s Freight Logistics Roadmap explicitly included partnering with private logistics firms on key freight corridors

RAILWAYSAFRICA.COM

. This encompasses not only running trains but possibly concessioning the operation or upgrading of certain lines. (Notably, an earlier plan to concession the critical Durban–Johannesburg line was put on hold, likely in favor of the open-access framework now being rolled out, to provide clarity and avoid “uncertainty” during the transition

FREIGHTNEWS.CO.ZA

Outlook (3–10 years): In the next three years, these reforms should start yielding visible changes – private trains hauling commodities like export coal, iron ore, manganese, or containers alongside Transnet’s trains. By the mid to late 2020s, if implementation stays on track, South Africa could have a more competitive rail market with multiple freight operators. This could mirror experiences in other countries where incumbents and new entrants share tracks. The long-term vision (10 years) is to achieve a substantial shift of freight from road to rail, reduce logistics costs, and improve reliability to shippers. Achieving the government’s 250 Mt/year rail freight target by 2030 (up from ~180 Mt in recent years) will require both Transnet and third-party operators to dramatically increase volumes

FOCUSONTRANSPORT.CO.ZA

. The reforms also leave room for private passenger services (though freight is the priority) and possibly the development of new standard-gauge high-speed lines in the longer run, per the National Rail Policy – but those are more than 10-year horizons. For now, stakeholders are focused on making open access for freight a success in the medium term.

Infrastructure Investment Needs and Opportunities

Opening the rail network exposes the stark reality that infrastructure constraints are the major bottleneck to growth. South Africa’s rail infrastructure has suffered from under-investment, theft/vandalism, and maintenance backlogs that limit capacity and reliability. Addressing these issues over the next decade is both a critical need and a key opportunity:

Aging Infrastructure & Maintenance Backlog: Many rail lines have speed restrictions due to poor track condition (worn rails, inadequate ballast, etc.), and outdated signalling systems that reduce throughput. Cable theft has crippled the electric signalling and catenary on some corridors, forcing slower manual operations or diesel substitution. Minister of Transport Barbara Creecy has acknowledged the “poor state of rail infrastructure, including issues with signalling and cabling,” as a top concern raised by private operators

RAILWAYSAFRICA.COM

. Fixing these will require billions in investment – repairing signals, replacing stolen copper with theft-resistant tech, and upgrading tracks and bridges for heavier, faster trains. The opportunity is that such investments, some funded by private partners, will dramatically improve network performance for all users.

Export Corridors – Low-Hanging Fruit: South Africa’s economy is heavily dependent on mining exports, and rail is the lifeline to ports for bulk commodities. In recent years, Transnet’s failure to meet demand (due to locomotive shortages and infrastructure issues) has cost exporters billions in lost revenue. Now, private miners and exporters are stepping up with capital. A consortium of coal and iron ore exporters (including majors like Glencore and Anglo American) is negotiating investments of “billions of rand” with Transnet to repair and enhance critical corridors – notably the coal line to Richards Bay and the iron ore/manganese lines in the Northern Cape

RAILWAY-TECHNOLOGY.COM

. In return, the government is allowing these companies or their appointed operators to run trains on those lines from April 2025

BLOOMBERG.COM

. This is a win-win: infrastructure gets fixed and expanded, export capacity increases (boosting national income), and private operators get guaranteed throughput. Over the next 3–5 years, we will likely see major upgrades on: the Coal Corridor (Mpumalanga/Limpopo to Richards Bay), the Iron Ore line (Sishen to Saldanha), and the Manganese corridor (Northern Cape to Gqeberha/Nelson Mandela Bay) – all identified as candidates for private sector participation

RAILWAYSAFRICA.COM

. These projects may include adding passing loops, strengthening bridges for heavier trains, and modernizing loading facilities. They directly create demand for more rolling stock (to haul additional tonnage) and service opportunities for firms like Traxtion to provide locomotives.

General Freight and Intermodal Opportunities: Beyond bulk mining, there is a huge logistics opportunity in capturing containerized and agricultural freight currently moving by road. The Durban–Johannesburg (Natal Corridor) is notorious for heavy truck traffic; shifting even a portion back to rail would require upgrading this main line’s capacity and reliability. Plans are afoot to concession parts of the container corridor or involve private logistics companies in revamping rail service for containers and automotive freight

RAILWAYSAFRICA.COM

. Government has hinted at designating South Africa’s container ports (like Durban and Ngqura) as transshipment hubs which would increase rail flows of containers inland

RAILWAYSAFRICA.COM

. To handle this, investment is needed in intermodal terminals, double-tracking certain sections, and acquiring suitable wagons. Private terminal operators and freight forwarders (some organized under the Multi-Modal Inland Port Association, MIPA) are actively investing in inland terminals and technology to facilitate a road-to-rail shift

FOCUSONTRANSPORT.CO.ZA

. Over 5–10 years, the build-out of a modern intermodal network – new dry ports, upgraded terminals in Gauteng, Cape Town, etc. – could substantially grow rail’s share in manufactured goods logistics.

Structural Improvements and New Projects: The longer-term (5–10 year) horizon may see entirely new projects, such as new rail lines or extensions under a private concession model. The government’s new “authorisation regime” (inspired by Brazil’s model) could allow private entities to build and operate new feeder lines or sidings more easily

ALG-GLOBAL.COM

. For example, a mining company could lay a short railway from a new mine to link with the main network, under an easier approval process. There is also discussion of eventually introducing standard-gauge high-speed freight or passenger lines (for instance, a high-capacity standard-gauge line from Durban to Gauteng in the far future), but within the 10-year outlook, the focus remains on improving the existing Cape gauge network and possibly adding dual-gauge sections if needed for interoperability

SABOA.CO.ZA

RAILWAYPRO.COM

. Any new standard-gauge pilot line would require significant foreign investment and likely only come to fruition post-2030.

Funding and Investment Models: The scale of investment needed (tens of billions of rand) means creative funding. We expect blended finance – combinations of public funds, multilateral loans, and private capital. The government has created mechanisms for private funding of rail: for instance, if an “access seeker” (like a potential operator) identifies a needed infrastructure upgrade, a framework is being set so they can fund it and secure rights in return, aligned with international precedent

TRANSPORT.GOV.ZA

. This could be similar to take-or-pay contracts where an investor pays for added capacity and gets guaranteed slots over a period. For lenders, these arrangements can provide more certainty (contracted cash flows for usage). The upside is significant: if infrastructure improves, rail can carry more volume at lower unit cost, enhancing the revenue of all operators and making the sector more competitive.

In summary, infrastructure renewal is both the biggest need and the biggest opportunity. South Africa’s rail network expansion and rehab over the next decade will likely follow a corridor approach, tackling the worst bottlenecks with targeted projects and leveraging private co-investment to accelerate timelines

RAILWAYSAFRICA.COM

. This will create a virtuous cycle: better infrastructure → more rail traffic → more revenue and justification for further investment. However, execution will be key – as discussed in Risk Factors below, delays or failure to upgrade infrastructure could stifle the entire open-access initiative.

Implications for Rolling Stock Demand (Locomotives & Wagons)

With more operators entering and freight volumes poised to grow, demand for rolling stock – locomotives and wagons – is set to increase substantially in the coming years. From a credit review standpoint, this means potential business growth for rolling stock suppliers and lessors like Traxtion, but also a need for significant capital investment. Several factors drive the rolling stock outlook:

Fleet Expansion for New Operators: Every new train operator accessing the network will need its own locomotives (and often its own wagons or those of its customers). Transnet Freight Rail currently owns the majority of locomotives and wagons in the country; third-party operators cannot assume use of Transnet’s fleet and thus must procure or lease their own equipment. As a result, the open-access reform is catalyzing fleet expansion plans. Traxtion, for example, announced plans to invest an initial R1.5 billion in new locomotives and wagons, and up to R14–17 billion over five years if the market takes off

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

. This is on top of its existing fleet. Similarly, other logistics players or mining companies may purchase locomotives to be operated by contract operators. We anticipate dozens of additional mainline locomotives will be required in the next 5 years, and potentially a hundred+ within a decade, depending on how many slots are actually used. Wagons will be needed in the hundreds or low thousands, especially for bulk commodities and intermodal service (e.g. container flat wagons).

Replacement of Aged Assets: As noted, much of Transnet’s current rolling stock is old. There is pent-up demand to retire life-expired units. Transnet’s own fleet renewal was stalled; once financing and partnerships improve, Transnet itself may re-tender or revive procurement for new locomotives (to replace classes from the 1970s). Additionally, if private operators demonstrate efficiency, Transnet could decide to outsource or sell surplus rolling stock. Indeed, Transnet has already sold some older locomotives to private firms (the Class 39s sold to Traxtion in 2022

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

). We expect a secondary market to develop: Transnet offloading locomotives it can’t maintain or use, which private operators rebuild. This effectively recycles assets and drives demand for overhaul services and parts. Over 10 years, however, a larger portion of the fleet will need outright renewal with new-build locomotives – likely giving a boost to local assembly plants. (Notably, one potential supplier is TMH Africa, which set up a plant in Boksburg; Traxtion’s CEO indicated interest in partnering with a “blue-chip OEM” for new loco assembly in South Africa

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

Wagon Fleet Growth: The mining sector’s expansion plans illustrate wagon demand. For example, if coal exporters plan to export significantly more tonnage via private trains, they will need to procure additional coal hopper wagons to form those trains. The same goes for iron ore and manganese wagon fleets. Domestic manufacturers (like Transnet’s Freight Rail Engineering, or private firms) stand to benefit – Traxtion indicated it would source wagons from domestic manufacturers for its expansion

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

. Market norms for wagons: high-capacity, automated coupling, track-friendly bogies will be preferred. Also, maintenance of wagons (wheelsets, bearings) will increase – an area Traxtion and others offer services in (e.g. Traxtion’s wheel shop for wagon wheels

TRAXTION.AFRICA

). Lenders should note that wagons, while simpler than locomotives, also have long lives and will likely be financed either through lease arrangements or by customers directly (a mine might finance its own wagon fleet and contract an operator to haul them).

Diverse Rolling Stock Needs: Open access might also spur demand for specialized rolling stock. For instance, agricultural businesses might invest in grain wagons or refrigerated container systems if they can run dedicated trains. RailRunner SA (mentioned by MIPA) has introduced innovative wagons that are lightweight and allow road trailers to be carried on rail without cranes

FOCUSONTRANSPORT.CO.ZA

. Those kinds of innovations, tailored to South African conditions, could see uptake if they prove cost-effective under the new tariff regime. This means the next decade isn’t just about more rolling stock, but potentially more modern and specialized equipment to meet specific market niches – an opportunity for rolling stock leasing companies to differentiate their fleets.

Financing and Leasing Growth: As the demand for locomotives and wagons grows, so too will the need for financing. We expect growth in leasing companies and finance leases. Traxtion already operates Africa’s largest private loco leasing fleet

TRAXTION.AFRICA

. International lessors may also show interest, although the gauge difference means not all global surplus stock can be used. Creative financing, such as vendor financing from manufacturers, or government-supported credit (for example, export-import bank loans if locomotives are supplied by an overseas OEM), will come into play. A lender reviewing Traxtion’s prospects should consider that Traxtion may take on significant debt or lease obligations to acquire new rolling stock, but this is often backed by long-term service contracts with customers (providing some revenue certainty). Additionally, rolling stock assets have resale value in the region (given many neighboring countries also need fleet renewal), which can mitigate downside risk.

In quantitative terms, one industry estimate (from Traxtion’s 2020 plan) suggested an initial 50 locomotives and 200 wagons in its fleet would be just the start

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

. By 2024, Traxtion had grown to 60 locomotives across 8 countries

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

, anticipating further increases due to rising demand. If the open access reform succeeds, the total number of active mainline locomotives in South Africa (all operators combined) could grow by 20–30% in the next 5 years. For wagons, growth may be slightly less percentage-wise (since many old wagons can be repurposed), but we foresee new wagon orders especially for bulk commodities. The implication for rolling stock manufacturers and maintenance providers is positive – a revival of orders and workshop activity. For credit analysts, the key will be whether operators like Traxtion can secure long-term contracts to keep this new rolling stock profitably utilized, and whether the access charges and operating environment allow them to run enough train-kilometers to cover financing costs.

Risk Factors and Challenges

Despite the promising opportunities, several risk factors could impede the success of rail liberalization and affect the creditworthiness of market participants. A lender must weigh these carefully:

Infrastructure Constraints & Reliability: The rail network’s physical condition is a pivotal risk. If infrastructure upgrades lag or fail, private operators will be running on the same troubled tracks that hobbled Transnet. Ongoing problems like theft of signaling cables, vandalism, and unreliable power supply for electrified routes can lead to service disruptions

FOCUSONTRANSPORT.CO.ZA

. Until robust security measures and investments are implemented, there is a risk that new operators cannot achieve the service levels (transit time, frequency) promised to customers. Additionally, capacity bottlenecks – single-track sections with limited passing loops, congested junctions, etc. – may limit how many trains a third party can actually run even if they have slot rights. If a private operator can’t get path availability due to unexpected constraints, their revenue projections would suffer. Mitigation will depend on the effectiveness of the infrastructure manager (TRIM) in rapidly addressing maintenance issues and expanding capacity where demand justifies it. Lenders should monitor key performance indicators of network availability and downtimes.

Regulatory and Execution Risks: The success of open access hinges on fair and efficient regulation. There is execution risk in setting up the new regulator and TRIM – any delays in finalizing tariff rules, unclear slot allocation procedures, or bureaucratic hurdles in licensing operators could slow down implementation. Private entrants need certainty to invest; if, for example, the access fees are set too high or are changed arbitrarily, it could undermine their business cases. Another concern is possible policy reversals or inconsistency. While the current government is pro-reform, political winds could shift, especially if there are changes in administration or pushback from labor unions (Transnet’s unions might pressure to limit private encroachment). The regulator must also prove its independence; any perception that Transnet’s own operations get favoritism could deter other operators. Essentially, South Africa is late to rail reform and is trying to avoid mistakes – as Minister Creecy noted, they have learned from global cases to prevent “network fragmentation, competing ownership, tariff escalations, and network deterioration”

RAILWAYSAFRICA.COM

. However, the risk remains that governance failures or corruption could creep in, given past issues in SOEs. Investors and lenders will need to keep an eye on the actual enforcement of non-discriminatory access. A transparent monitoring mechanism (perhaps via the Economic Regulator’s reports) will be important.

Transnet’s Role and Financial Health: Transnet Freight Rail (TFR) doesn’t disappear under open access – it becomes one competitor among several, but also remains by far the largest player for now. If Transnet’s own performance continues to deteriorate (it reported a R7.3 billion loss recently

ARIA.ORG.ZA

), that has dual risks: on one hand, it frees market share for private operators; on the other hand, as an infrastructure custodian Transnet’s finances are needed to maintain the network. There is a counterparty risk if Transnet cannot fulfill its duties as infrastructure manager or if it defaults on partnership agreements. For example, if miners pre-fund upgrades, they need Transnet to execute those projects; Transnet’s weak balance sheet and procurement track record pose a risk to timely completion. Moreover, Transnet might resist full implementation in subtle ways – for instance, if its crews or control center give operational priority to Transnet trains over private ones, or if Transnet prices its own services strategically to undercut newcomers. The structural separation is meant to prevent this, but it will take diligence. Another angle is labor resistance: Transnet has a large workforce and powerful unions. If open access is seen as threatening jobs, there could be strikes or political pressure. A stable transition plan (possibly redeploying Transnet staff or involving them in private operations) is needed to mitigate social risk.

Political Economy and Policy Continuity: Rail reform in a middle-income country like South Africa faces political economy challenges. The notion of “privatization” can be contentious – indeed, stakeholders often avoid the word, preferring “open access” or “third-party participation.” However, effectively this is partial privatization of operations. There could be opposition from factions that favor state control. Upcoming elections or changes in government priorities could delay momentum. That said, there is broad consensus now that fixing logistics is critical for the economy, so a wholesale reversal is unlikely. Instead, the risk is more about slow implementation or bureaucratic inertia. Also, large-scale projects can be prone to corruption if not well-managed – South Africa’s state capture era showed how rail contracts (like the 1,064 locomotives deal) can be tainted. The new processes must be kept clean and competitive to maintain investor confidence. For a lender, the political risk can manifest as changes in regulation, difficulties in contract enforcement, or macroeconomic instability affecting government support. Close attention to government communications, legislation (like the ERT Act’s actual rollout), and industry lobby voices (e.g., African Rail Industry Association – ARIA) can give early warning of such issues.

Capital Intensity and Funding Challenges: Rail is highly capital-intensive, which means the sector’s transformation requires large upfront spending for uncertain future returns. Private operators will have significant capital expenditures in locomotives, wagons, training, and possibly terminal equipment before they see revenue. If access reform is slower than expected or initial volumes disappoint, companies could face financial strain. The cost of capital in South Africa can be high, and interest rates have risen globally, so financing these assets might carry substantial debt service requirements. Additionally, many benefits of rail (e.g. reduced road damage, environmental gains) are not directly monetizable by the operator, meaning government support or incentives might be needed to tip the scale for some projects. From a credit perspective, one should consider demand risk (will customers shift to new rail services as projected?) and pricing risk (if road transport rates drop in response, rail operators’ margins might be pressured). There’s also the risk of currency fluctuations if equipment is imported and financed in foreign currency. Furthermore, establishing a track record – the first few years of operations – will be crucial. If any early entrant fails (due to poor management or external factors), it could spook lenders and investors about the whole open-access venture. Ensuring adequate working capital and not over-leveraging in the initial phase is critical for players like Traxtion as they expand.

In summary, while the upside of the reforms is large, these risk factors underscore a need for caution. Mitigation will involve strong partnerships (public-private cooperation to tackle infrastructure and security issues), robust contracts (to provide assurance for investments), insurance where appropriate (for damage or theft disruptions), and perhaps government guarantees in certain cases (e.g. minimum volume guarantees on key corridors). A lender should stress test Traxtion’s projections against scenarios such as delays in getting slots, lower-than-expected volumes, or higher maintenance costs due to infrastructure failures.

Traxtion’s Market Position and Growth Plans

Traxtion (formerly Traxtion Sheltam) is a pivotal private player set to benefit from the new rail landscape. As a company, Traxtion has built a strong niche in providing locomotives, leasing, and rail operations across Africa, and is strategically positioning itself for South Africa’s open access. A brief overview of Traxtion’s capabilities and plans:

Fleet and Assets: Traxtion operates one of the largest privately owned mainline locomotive fleets in Africa

TRAXTION.AFRICA

. As of 2024, it has about 60 locomotives in its fleet deployed across 8 African countries

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

. These locomotives are mostly Cape gauge diesel-electrics, suitable for heavy freight. Traxtion has been augmenting its fleet by buying and overhauling used locomotives – for example, it acquired five Class 39 (GE type) locomotives from Transnet and completed major overhauls on them in 2023

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

. In addition, Traxtion owns or manages hundreds of wagons (the exact wagon fleet size isn’t publicly stated, but in 2020 it was around 200 and likely growing

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

). This sizable fleet gives Traxtion a ready stock of rolling stock to deploy as third-party operations commence, a competitive advantage over potential new entrants who would need to acquire equipment.

Rail Services and Depots: Traxtion’s capabilities go beyond just owning locomotives – it offers end-to-end rail services. The company runs a state-of-the-art Rail Services Hub in Rosslyn (Pretoria North), a 50,000 m² facility (with 11,000 m² under roof) that serves as a one-stop shop for locomotive rebuilding, maintenance, and training

TRAXTION.AFRICA

. This hub can refurbish up to 30 locomotives per year under OEM standards

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

, and has a wheel shop and component overhaul workshops

TRAXTION.AFRICA

. Traxtion is accredited by the Rail Safety Regulator and ISO9001 certified, underscoring its focus on quality and safety

TRAXTION.AFRICA

. Additionally, the company has mobile field service teams to respond to breakdowns on remote sections

TRAXTION.AFRICA

. These capabilities mean Traxtion not only can operate trains, but can also maintain its own and others’ rolling stock – a key part of its business model. It can thus offer full-service rail operations: providing locomotives, crews, and maintenance in an integrated package to a customer like a mine or logistics firm.

Operations and Track Record: Traxtion has operational experience in nine African countries (including South Africa, e.g. on branch lines or industrial operations, and countries like Zimbabwe, Botswana, Namibia, Angola, etc.)

WEAREVUKA.COM

. It holds a Rail Safety permit in South Africa, meaning it is authorized to run trains on the national network (this was previously used for shuttling its locos for lease or doing contracted shunts, but now can be leveraged for mainline services)

WEAREVUKA.COM

. Traxtion’s approach has often been to partner with industries – for instance, it secured a contract in Angola to operate on a port railway, and works with mining companies to haul their products. This client-centric, partnership approach aligns well with the new access regime, where customers may sponsor or choose an operator that best serves them. Traxtion’s safety record and reliability will be key selling points in attracting contracts away from Transnet.

Growth Plans under Open Access: Traxtion’s leadership has been openly optimistic about rail liberalization. Back in 2020, anticipating these reforms, CEO James Holley called the policy change “exciting” and intended to invest heavily in new rolling stock

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

. The company indicated it would partner with a blue-chip OEM for new locomotives assembled in SA and source wagons locally

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

. This suggests Traxtion could be a launch customer for a locomotive manufacturer setting up in South Africa (such as TMH Africa or others

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

), potentially bringing modern locomotive designs onto the network. Traxtion also stated it will target general freight – not just bulk mining commodities – aiming to capture traffic that can be shifted from road

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

. This includes teaming up with established logistics companies to run container trains or mixed freight, where Traxtion provides the trains and the partner provides the freight and warehousing solutions

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

. Notably, Traxtion said it is not looking to invest in its own warehouses or terminals, preferring to partner, which keeps its focus on the rolling stock and train operations side

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

. We have already seen Traxtion’s involvement in initiatives like RailRunner (innovative intermodal) via MIPA, meaning it’s exploring new service models

FOCUSONTRANSPORT.CO.ZA

Market Position: In the context of South Africa’s third-party access, Traxtion is very well placed. It has first-mover advantage – while other potential operators exist (e.g., some mining companies might create in-house operating arms, or international rail companies might eye the market), none have the immediate footprint Traxtion does in terms of ready locomotives and local know-how. Traxtion’s “brand” in the market is that of a nimble private operator. It has experience dealing with the practical challenges (loading facilities, cross-border logistics, etc.) and can provide tailored solutions. For example, if a customer needs to move a certain tonnage per week, Traxtion can dedicate a set of locomotives and wagons and manage that end-to-end. This is very relevant under the new rules, where reliability and customer service could trump Transnet’s sometimes one-size-fits-all approach. Additionally, Traxtion’s compliance with B-BBEE (Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment) requirements

TRAXTION.AFRICA

positions it well to win contracts in South Africa’s business environment.

Credit Considerations for Traxtion: From a lender’s perspective, Traxtion’s strengths include its asset base (locomotives that are fairly liquid within the region), diversified operations (not solely dependent on SA mainline until that market ramps up, since they have contracts elsewhere), and alignment with government’s infrastructure goals. However, Traxtion’s growth plans will likely require significant funding – the upper range of R17 billion investment is ambitious

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

. The company will need to stage investments carefully as slot opportunities materialize. It’s likely Traxtion will initially focus on a few corridors or contracts to avoid overstretching. The company’s ability to secure long-term haulage agreements (e.g. a multi-year contract with a coal exporter to haul X million tons annually) will be crucial to underpin new locomotive purchases. Another factor is foreign exchange: if new locomotives are procured, they may involve foreign components (dollar or euro exposure) – Traxtion might seek funding in those currencies or hedges accordingly. On the operational side, scaling up will require hiring and training more crews – Traxtion fortunately has its own training academy in Gauteng for drivers and technicians

TRAXTION.AFRICA

, which reduces execution risk in human resources. All told, Traxtion stands to be a major beneficiary of rail liberalization and, with prudent management, could see strong revenue growth, making it an attractive (though asset-heavy) credit. Lenders should keep an eye on how quickly Traxtion converts opportunities into secured contracts and whether its cost control and maintenance practices keep pace with fleet expansion (to avoid any operational hiccups).

Traxtion locomotives at the company’s Rosslyn rail hub in Pretoria. These Cape-gauge diesel-electric units (in Traxtion’s orange livery) are part of the private fleet ready to serve new freight contracts under open access. Traxtion’s extensive workshop facilities and locomotive fleet give it a head-start as South Africa opens its rail network to private operators.

TRAXTION.AFRICA

International Case Studies: Lessons from Rail Liberalization

South Africa’s rail reform can draw on lessons from other emerging and middle-income economies that have implemented similar policies. Not all experiences are directly transferable, but they offer insight into potential outcomes and pitfalls:

India: Indian Railways (IR) remains state-owned and vertically integrated, but India has experimented with private freight operations in limited ways. For example, since 2006 India allowed Private Container Train Operators (PCTOs) to run container trains on IR’s network by paying haulage fees. This led to several logistics companies operating their own rakes of wagons, albeit hauled by IR locomotives and crews. The lesson from this model is that private involvement can increase investment (many new container flats were purchased) and improve service for customers, but if the state operator retains too much control, benefits are limited. Indeed, PCTOs in India struggled at times because IR prioritized its own services (especially its subsidiary CONCOR) and had opaque allocation of train paths. More recently, India planned to invite private operators for passenger trains and to use the new Dedicated Freight Corridors (DFC) – these plans have met mixed reactions

RAILWAY-TECHNOLOGY.COM

. Key takeaway: Clear separation of roles is crucial – India’s partial measures show that without an independent regulator or infrastructure manager, the incumbent can stifle competition. On the positive side, India’s massive investment in freight corridors (double-stack container routes, etc.) demonstrates that modern infrastructure is vital to make rail appealing to customers

RAILFREIGHT.COM

. South Africa can learn from India’s focus on linking major industrial centers by rail and the need to keep freight tariffs competitive to attract volume (India often cross-subsidized passenger fares with freight, which hurt rail’s market share). For Traxtion, the India case underscores the importance of a fair playing field; if Transnet as infrastructure manager behaves neutrally like DFC Corp aims to, private operators can thrive, but if not, they will face an uphill battle.

Brazil: In the 1990s, Brazil privatized its freight railways through regional concessions – private companies leased entire corridors or networks to operate and maintain. This led to significant investment and growth in freight volumes. By one account, since privatization in 1997, Brazil’s private rail concessionaires grew traffic by about 117% and poured billions into rolling stock and infrastructure

RAILJOURNAL.COM

. Efficiency improved, especially on heavy haul routes for iron ore (e.g., Vale’s railroads) and agriculture (e.g., the North-South Railway). However, the concession model also meant monopoly operators on each corridor, and smaller customers sometimes complained of high tariffs or lack of service priority if they weren’t in the concessionaire’s core business. In recent years, Brazil has been moving toward an open access or “authorization” regime: a new law (2018 and 2021 updates) allows companies to build new rail lines or run services with simpler authorization, aiming to encourage competition and new routes

ALG-GLOBAL.COM

. One lesson from Brazil is the importance of network interoperability – initially, different concessions had little incentive to interchange traffic, but over time, they realized the need for through services, leading to some open access agreements between them. Brazil also saw that massive private investment can be attracted (the government’s current plan envisions virtually all new rail investment coming from private sector

RAILJOURNAL.COM

), but it requires a stable concession framework or access regime. For South Africa, the Brazil example suggests that allowing private capital into rail can dramatically boost capacity – Brazil’s rail market share of freight increased and rail freight volumes nearly doubled in two decades

IJBMER.COM

. But it also warns that if only one private operator gets control per corridor, you might swap a public monopoly for a private monopoly. South Africa’s choice to keep infrastructure under a form of public oversight and allow multiple operators could actually leapfrog Brazil’s initial model by injecting competition from the start. Additionally, Brazil’s new approach to encourage short lines and private spur lines could be emulated to attract mining companies to link their sites to the core network. For a company like Traxtion, Brazil’s concessions show the value of having long-term rights to operate – security of tenure allows investment. If South Africa’s slot allocations are too short-term or uncertain, it may deter the kind of big investment seen in Brazil. Thus, crafting the right length and conditions for track access agreements will be important (in Brazil, concessions run decades, which is analogous to having multi-year slots in SA).

Australia: Australia offers a more mature example of rail liberalization in a resource-rich, large country context. Over the 1990s and 2000s, Australia went through vertical separation and privatization. Interstate track is managed by the Australian Rail Track Corporation (ARTC, government-owned), which provides open access to any accredited operator. Several private freight operators now compete, such as Pacific National, Aurizon, SCT Logistics, and Qube, particularly on long-distance corridors. Additionally, heavy haul mining railways in the Pilbara (iron ore region) are privately owned and operated (though those are closed access, not shared). The results in Australia have been generally positive for freight customers: there’s been innovation and improved service in intermodal trains (e.g., specialized high-speed freight trains, better on-time performance) and new entrants have managed to break the duopoly of older operators in certain markets. The rail share of freight on key corridors like Melbourne–Perth is very high (rail dominates that long haul), thanks to competition driving efficiency and reliability. However, Australia also shows that open access is not a panacea – the share of rail on shorter hauls (e.g., between Sydney and Brisbane) remains low due to competition from trucking, indicating that rail must still play to its strengths (distance, volume) and requires continuous public investment in infrastructure to stay competitive. The government invested heavily in upgrades (like the Sydney–Melbourne line, the Advanced Train Management System trial, etc.) to enable higher speeds and heavier loads. A specific lesson from Australia is the importance of an independent regulator and transparent path allocation – ARTC’s system of slot management and the regulator’s oversight of access pricing have been crucial to maintain fairness. Disputes have occurred and been resolved through regulated processes, giving confidence to private operators. Also, Australia’s experience suggests that multiple operators can coexist profitably if the market is big enough and each finds a niche (some focus on bulk grain, others on containers, etc.). For South Africa, with its relatively lower volumes, the number of viable competitors might be fewer, but the principle of competition improving outcomes likely holds. From a credit perspective, Australia’s private freight companies are generally financially stable (some are even investment-grade or part of larger logistics groups), which indicates that well-implemented rail liberalization can create commercially sustainable operators. Traxtion could aspire to become South Africa’s equivalent of a Pacific National – a large-scale independent freight carrier – if the market grows and it secures a strong base of business. The Australian case also highlights labor and safety management: even with multiple operators, Australia has maintained strong safety records, something South Africa will need to uphold through its Rail Safety Regulator as more operators join the network.

Other cases, like Mexico (which concessioned its railways in the 1990s to private operators and saw volume growth but also some monopoly issues) or the European Union (which mandated open access and now has many cross-border operators), echo similar themes: the need for an effective regulator, the benefits of competition in lowering costs, and the necessity of ongoing infrastructure funding by the state. In emerging economies, one specific risk is that if the incumbent is very weak (financially or operationally), the transition can falter – e.g., in some African countries, private concessions failed because the state of infrastructure was so poor and governments couldn’t support rehabilitation. South Africa is mitigating that by involving strong private partners up front to fix infrastructure (as seen in the coal/iron ore lines deal)

RAILWAY-TECHNOLOGY.COM

. In conclusion, international experiences show that rail liberalization can unlock efficiency and investment, but it requires careful implementation. South Africa’s hybrid approach (state-owned infrastructure manager with private train operators) is actually in line with EU and Australian models rather than the Latin American concession model, which is a positive choice for competition. The key lessons are to ensure fair access, adequate infrastructure funding, and alignment of all stakeholders (government, incumbent, new entrants, customers). If done right, South Africa could replicate the successes – doubling freight volumes like Brazil, fostering innovation like Australia, and attracting private capital like India’s freight corridors – while avoiding the pitfalls of poor regulation or underinvestment.

Outlook and Credit Considerations

Over the next 3 to 10 years, South Africa’s rail sector is poised to transform from a stagnant monopoly to a more dynamic, investment-driven industry. The outlook is cautiously optimistic: the reforms address core issues and have high-level political support, but their success will depend on execution and collaboration between Transnet and the private sector. For Traxtion, the strategic prospects are strong. The company stands to gain significant new business as one of the first movers in third-party operations. If it secures contracts on key corridors (e.g., hauling export minerals or running intermodal services for large logistics providers), its revenue could grow substantially, diversifying beyond its current pan-African leasing activities. Traxtion’s existing asset base and technical capabilities position it well to capture opportunities without the long lead time a newcomer would face. The company’s growth plan – investing in new locos, partnering with OEMs, training personnel – aligns with the sector’s needs

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

. From a credit viewpoint, Traxtion could evolve from a niche leasing firm into a leading private rail operator with a stable cash flow base, akin to an essential infrastructure service provider, especially if it enters long-term haulage agreements. However, the company’s creditworthiness will hinge on managing the risks outlined. Lenders should monitor a few key indicators over the coming years:

Slot and Contract Wins: How many and which slots/operatorships does Traxtion secure in South Africa? Early wins will validate its competitive edge. For instance, if by 2026 Traxtion is operating daily trains on the coal line or the NatCor (Natal Corridor), it will have established a reliable income stream. No or few slots won could mean stronger competition or regulatory hurdles impacted its plans.

Operational Performance: As Traxtion ramps up operations, maintaining high locomotive availability and service reliability will be crucial to keep customers and contracts. Any major incidents or inability to meet haulage commitments (perhaps due to infrastructure issues or maintenance shortcomings) could affect its reputation and financials. On the flip side, demonstrating that private operators can outperform the incumbent in efficiency will likely lead to more business (shippers shifting volumes to them).

Financial Management: Traxtion’s balance sheet will likely expand. Debt levels will rise if it purchases new rolling stock. The company must balance leverage with contract-backed cash flows. Ideally, debt used to buy locomotives is amortized by the long-term contracts those locos serve. Lenders will look at the debt service coverage from those contracts. Additionally, Traxtion’s success in raising equity or quasi-equity (perhaps from development finance institutions or infrastructure funds keen on African logistics) could bolster its capital structure, reducing over-reliance on debt. Strong sponsorship and governance will be a plus in credit assessments.

Regulatory Environment: Any changes in the regulatory framework – such as access charges being higher than expected, or delays in establishing the permanent Rail Economic Regulator – could impact Traxtion’s cost structure or timing. Close engagement with policymakers (through industry groups like ARIA) can help Traxtion anticipate and adapt. Lenders might seek covenants or clauses that provide some protection or renegotiation triggers if the operating environment changes materially (for example, if access costs escalate beyond a certain point set in the financial model).

Diversification and Resilience: Traxtion’s operations across multiple countries and sectors can provide a cushion. If one corridor underperforms, business elsewhere (like rail construction projects or leasing in other African nations) could support the company. However, increased focus on South Africa will mean higher exposure to the local economy and Transnet’s network. Diversification of customer base will be key – serving a mix of mining companies, industrial clients, and logistics providers so that Traxtion isn’t overly dependent on one mega-contract (which could be renegotiated or lost). Building a portfolio of medium-sized contracts might be healthier than one giant deal, from a risk perspective.

In the big picture, the next decade could witness a revitalization of South Africa’s railways. If reforms stay their course, freight volumes could surge, roads could see less congestion and damage, and the economy could save on logistics costs (improving global competitiveness of South African exports). Environmental benefits (lower carbon emissions per ton-km on rail vs road) also strengthen the case for rail. For Traxtion and its peers, this is a chance to become the backbone of a new rail logistics ecosystem. In essence, Traxtion could transition into an infrastructure-like company, with predictable long-term cash flows, which is attractive for lenders – but only if the enabling environment (infrastructure and regulation) matures as planned. In conclusion, South Africa’s opening of the rail network to third parties is a game-changer, bringing both opportunities and challenges. Key opportunities include increased private investment, more efficient supply chains, and growth in rolling stock demand – all of which companies like Traxtion are gearing up to seize. Structural reforms and partnerships are addressing the legacy issues, though not without execution risk. The implications for rolling stock are clear: a newer, larger fleet will be needed, spurring business for manufacturers and lessors. Yet, risk factors like infrastructure reliability, regulatory execution, and Transnet’s stability need to be actively managed. A leveraged finance lender evaluating Traxtion should take comfort in the positive market reforms and Traxtion’s capabilities

TRAXTION.AFRICA

, but also remain vigilant about the implementation risks in this evolving landscape. With prudent risk mitigation and continued public-private cooperation, the outlook for the South African rail sector – and Traxtion within it – is one of cautious optimism, trending toward sustainable growth and improved credit profiles over the medium to long term. Sources: High-quality news and industry analyses have been used in this report, including Engineering News, Railways Africa, Railway Gazette International, Bloomberg/Railway-Technology, and official policy documents. Key references are indicated in-text with the corresponding citations for further reading and verification of facts. For example, the reforms and network statement are detailed in sources

RAILWAYSAFRICA.COM

ARIA.ORG.ZA

, Traxtion’s investment plans in

RAILWAYGAZETTE.COM

, and miners’ planned rail investments in

RAILWAY-TECHNOLOGY.COM

, among others. These sources collectively underpin the assessment of the sector’s trajectory and the company-specific analysis.

South African Rail Sector Outlook Third Party Access Reforms

South African Rail Sector Outlook Third Party Access Reforms